Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ninad, Khandare V.
- Integrated Laboratory Practices in the Question Papers
Abstract Views :67 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali (E), IN
2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
3 Department of Computer Science Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali(E), IN
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali (E), IN
2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
3 Department of Computer Science Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali(E), IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 36, No SP (2022), Pagination: 191-199Abstract
Laboratory classes are an essential part of an engineering course. Laboratory sessions are primarily designed to develop proficiency in technical skills, offer an opportunity to place theory in context, develop critical thinking skills and promote investigation-based learning. Laboratory experiences will help to develop as independent learners, researchers, critical thinkers, and generators of knowledge. There are several improvements that need to be implemented to improve student laboratory experiences. The purpose of this research is to integrate with end semester examination in view of requirements of the 21st century. This paper highlight the evaluation system which is robust and dynamic as compared to the traditional evaluation system. This research is based on the feedback collected from industrialists and academicians on the present examination system. The paper has come up with the result that 50 % of academicians are of the opinion that examination paper patterns should include the laboratory-based question. The paper highlights the curriculum design aspect related to the question paper setting. The paper brings some critical points related to the integration of laboratory conduct and evaluation system with end semester examination.Keywords
Laboratory Work, Learner, Knowledge, Integration, Examination, Evaluation.References
- .ABET, Guidelines and application for provisional status in the Washington Accord. 2003. http://www.washingtonaccord.org/wash_accor trans.html,http://www.washingtonaccord.org/
- . Lattuca, L.R., P.T. Terenzini, and J.F. Volkwein, Engineering Change: A Study of the Impact of EC2000. 2006: ABET. http://www.abet.org/papers.shtml
- . Brown, N.J. and O.T. Brown, Mechatronics: a graduate perspective. Journal of Mechatronics, 2002. 12(2): p. 159-167.
- . Lucena, J.C., Globalisation and organizational change: engineers experiences and their implications for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 31(3): p. 321-338.
- . Sivakumar, S.C., et al., A web-based remote interactive laboratory for Internetworking education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2005. 48(4): p. 586-598.
- . Feisel, L.D. and A.J. Rosa, The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1).
- . Trevelyan, J.P., Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 96(3): p. 191-204.
- . Arpaia, P., et al., A remote measurement laboratory for educational experiments. Measurement, 1997. 21(4): p. 157-169.
- Lindsay, E. and M. Good, Razali, Z.B. and Trevelyan, J.P., Valuable Experience in Engineering Laboratory: enhance understanding of engineering concepts. Outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 2005. 48(4): p. 619-631.
- Somech, A. and B. Ronit, Tacit knowledge in academia: Its effects on student learning. Journal of Psychology, 1999. 133(6): p. 605- 617.
- Leornard, N. and G.S. Insch, Tacit Knowledge in Academia: A Proposed Model and Measurement Scale. Journal of Psychology, 2005. 139(6): p. 495-512.
- . Ree, M.J. and J.A. Earles, Intelligence Is The Best Predictor Of Job Performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1992. June: p. 86-89.
- Sternberg, R.J., L. Okagaki, and A.S. Jackson, Practical intelligence for success in school. Educational Leadership, 1990. 48(1): p. 35- 39.
- Wagner, R.K. and R.J. Sternberg, Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985. 49: p. 436-458.
- Webb, A., Design of a Thermofluids Pump Laboratory, in School of Mechanical Engineering. 2003, The University of Western Australia.: Perth.
- Christiansen, F.V. and C. Rump, Getting it right: conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2007. 32(4): p. 467- 479
- Rameshaiah, G.N., Suneetha, Y.K., Siddiqui, S., Sriraman, A. and Prabhu, N., Outcomes of Laboratory Experimentation in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum.
- Christiansen, F.V. and Rump, C., 2007. Getting it right: conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), pp.467-479.
- Corter, J.E., Nickerson, J.V., Esche, S.K. and Chassapis, C., 2004, October. Remote versus hands-on labs: A comparative study. In 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. (pp. F1G-
- Improvement and Implementation of Contemporary Education System
Abstract Views :29 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Khandare V. Ninad
1,
Gaikwad P. Ugandhara
1,
Kasturiwale P. Hemant
2,
Jagtap A. Seema
1,
Alegavi Sujata
3
Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
3 Department of Internets of Think, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
3 Department of Internets of Think, Thakur College of Engineering and Technology, Kandivali, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 37, No SP (2023), Pagination: 26-31Abstract
In this paper our aim is to highlights the needs for the replacement of the traditional education system with the contemporary education system. The contemporary education system is often compared to traditional education, which is more focused on rote learning, memorization, and the transmission of information from teacher to student. The contemporary education system refers to the current and modern approach to education. It emphasizes on the use of technology, practical learning, critical thinking, and creativity to provide students with the necessary skills and knowledge to succeed in a rapidly changing world. In this paper , elaborate the various ways of contemporary education system which emphasizes on hands-on learning experiences, project-based learning, and student-cantered approaches that help students to learn in a more engaging and effective way. The contemporary education system helps to prepare students for the real world by equipping them with the ability to think critically, solve problems, communicate effectively, work collaboratively, and adapt to changing situations.Keywords
Traditional system, Contemporary system , Assessment; Evaluation, divergent assessment, TBL.References
- Ninad, K. V., Hemant, K. P., & Raghvendra, S. R. (2022). Integrated Laboratory Practices in the Question Papers. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36.
- Gijare, V. V., & Kasturiwale, H. P. (2022). Assessment System or Method for Developing Attitude Competency and Mindset of learners. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue 1).
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). “Recognizing and Developing Effective Teachers: What Policy Brief: Policy
- Association. Danielson, C. and McGreal, T. (2000). “Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice.” Alexandria,Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Apple, D.K, & Krumsieg. K. (1998). Process education teaching institute handbook. Corvalis,OR: Pacific Crest Software.
- Linn, R. L. (1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
- McAlpine, M. (2002). Principles of assessment. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, Robert
- Clark Center for Technological Education. Available at: //www.caacentre.ac.uk/dldocs/Bluepaper1.pdf
- Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Wass, V., Van der Vleuten, J., & Shatzer, R.J. (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. The Lancet, 357, 945-949.
- Braun, H. (2010). “Getting Value Out of Value-Added: Report of a Workshop.” Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- Brookhart, S. (2009). “Accountability Policies and Measures.” Washington, D.C.: National Education
- Goe, L. and Croft, A. (2009). “Research-To-Practice Brief: Methods of Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness.” Washington, D.C.: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.